Nullify

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Product Security Terms›
LLM Evaluation

Product Security Terms

LLM Evaluation

NT
Nullify Team
October 23, 2026

What Is
LLM Evaluation
?

LLM evaluation is the practice of measuring how well a language model or AI system performs a specific task, using test cases with known answers and clear success criteria, so teams can compare models and catch regressions before changes reach users.

Also known as:

evals, AI evaluation, model evaluation

How LLM Evaluations Work

An evaluation, or eval, starts with a clear definition of success, such as the share of findings correctly classified or the share of fixes that pass tests. It then runs the system against a set of test cases and scores the results.

  • Exact checks. Compare output to a known answer, such as true or false positive.
  • Code-based checks. Run tests, builds or scripts against what the model produced.
  • Model-based grading. Use another model, with a clear rubric, to grade open-ended output.
  • Human review. Have experts grade a sample, especially for new or high-stakes tasks.

Why Evals Matter in Security

Public benchmarks say little about how a model will perform on your code, your stack and your findings. An evaluation set built from real, labeled cases tells you whether a new model, prompt or routing rule actually improves results, and whether it quietly makes something worse.

What to Measure

  • Accuracy on both sides: real issues missed and false ones kept.
  • Cost and latency per task, since a better answer at ten times the price may not be worth it.
  • Consistency across repeated runs.
  • Behavior on edge cases, such as unusual languages, very large files or tool errors.

Evaluation Is Continuous

Models are updated, deprecated and replaced often. Every change to a model, prompt, tool or routing rule should be checked against the evaluation set before it ships, the same way code changes are checked against tests.

How Nullify Approaches Evaluation

Nullify measures architecture changes against controlled comparisons before adopting them, and treats proof as the standard for output: exploits are independently re-reviewed before they are reported, and proposed fixes are checked against builds and tests before a PR opens. See how Nullify proves findings and fixes.

Key Takeaways

  • LLM evaluation measures task performance against test cases and clear success criteria.
  • Public benchmarks rarely predict performance on your own code.
  • Measure misses, false alarms, cost and consistency, not just accuracy.
  • Re-run evals before every model, prompt or routing change.

Read More About
LLM Evaluation

Exploit Validation

See Nullify in Action

Nullify proves findings and fixes before they reach your team.

Learn more

See how Nullify finds and fixes what matters

Nullify scores every finding on reachability, exploitability and business context before it reaches your team.

Book a live demo